As you might have heard, Congress has brought a big step toward banning most online gambling.
Rather than trying to outlaw gambling sites, which would be impossible to accomplish since virtually all are not in the US, they want to make processing or handling payments illegal. The effect, gamblers would not manage to use bank cards, debit cards, or even make direct transfers from US bank accounts to fund their accounts.
Supporters of the ban claim the Internet’s widespread availability makes it too an easy task to gamble and creates betting addictions and financial problems.
Internet gambling sites are estimated to take in $12 billion annually. 50% of this $12 billion arises from gamblers in the US. Critics with this proposed law เกมยิงปลาฟรีเครดิต argued that regulating a and collecting taxes could be far better than outlawing it. Prohibition didn’t work for alcohol. It won’t work for gambling.
The government had a chance to regulate online gambling and take advantage of the tax revenue. A recently available study estimates Internet poker alone, if regulated and taxed, could net the us government $3.3 billion each year.
But rather they’ve turned the financial institutions into the police. In addition they propose to improve the most penalty for violations from two to five years in prison.
The 2 Republican representatives who sponsored the bill, Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Jim Leach of Iowa managed to slip in exemptions for the horse racing industry and state lotteries. Certainly not fair allowing online lotteries and Internet betting on horse racing while cracking down on other types of sports betting, casino games and card games like poker.
In several countries the us government has chosen to regulate online gambling rather than ban it. It’s much more practical and besides, it is a form of recreation for all people.
Fortunately there are still some thinking congressmen in Washington who’ve doubts about the bill’s effectiveness and have gone so far as to call it a feel-good little bit of legislation. A bill more about news-making than lawmaking.
A far better approach should be to allow a to come calmly to the United States and regulate it. This can be a situation everyone who’s or has gambled online will want to watch on.